Yes, Prof Hamilton has some very interesting thoughts. Although probably above my paygrade, John Henry Newman sounds like a “liminal” player, incidently, as was Brian Stoney, possibly. However, I would dare to speculate that although a crafty, baroque swordsmith, he, the former, was probably also a solid analyst. Tho’ I just pulled that idea out of my bottom, sounded profound, but I couldn’t be bothered researching him too deeply.
I’m no economist but I wonder if we couldn’t grant the poor, y inclusion les fous, a UBI. Anthropologist Graeber gives it thumbs up; Milton Friedman too. The devil obviously lies in the detail.
Jean Vanier, Aristotelian prof and friend of trisomy, might provide endorsement of your thoughts but I do wonder how big the Ark must be. Can we have an infinite Ark of infinitudinous cubits in the reality of physics? Ought we, indeed, in a nod to Hume?
Yes, Prof Hamilton has some very interesting thoughts. Although probably above my paygrade, John Henry Newman sounds like a “liminal” player, incidently, as was Brian Stoney, possibly. However, I would dare to speculate that although a crafty, baroque swordsmith, he, the former, was probably also a solid analyst. Tho’ I just pulled that idea out of my bottom, sounded profound, but I couldn’t be bothered researching him too deeply.
I’m no economist but I wonder if we couldn’t grant the poor, y inclusion les fous, a UBI. Anthropologist Graeber gives it thumbs up; Milton Friedman too. The devil obviously lies in the detail.
Jean Vanier, Aristotelian prof and friend of trisomy, might provide endorsement of your thoughts but I do wonder how big the Ark must be. Can we have an infinite Ark of infinitudinous cubits in the reality of physics? Ought we, indeed, in a nod to Hume?
Thank you for your thoughts, Richard.